#Windows terminal services vs rdp license#
If a client just needed to sun a single application such as word, it would probably be cheaper to buy the license for word for that client. Terminal services is used when clients want to run an application from the server.
Is this cost justified by not having to purchase application licenses for the client? I am a little confused at this point and probably don't understand this right. That means that a client using terminal services must have two licenses. I have some other questions:ġ) In order to use terminal services one must purchase terminal services licenses in addition the CALs. Looks free to me when I click on the link.
#Windows terminal services vs rdp install#
To have more than that, you must install the Terminal Services Licensing package, which provides for more connections Edited Augby Menge On 2003, without Terminal Services you can have up to two simultaneous Remote Desktop connections + 1 terminal (which means you can be logged locally and still have 2 other people remote desktop in). In Windows XP, you can have up to 2 concurrent windows sessions (one on the terminal and one on remote). You can actually host a couple of sessions without Terminal Services installed (thought it actually kinda is - but the licensing part which allows more than 2 connections is not). Terminal Services is the name given to the server portion.
Remote Desktop is the name for the "client part". You can administer a server through Remote Desktop, yes.
if you have the specific service installed, then you can have as many as you say :)Įdit to answer question below without double-posting: On Windows Server 2003, you can have up to two simultaneous Remote Desktop connections if you don't have Terminal Services installed.
0 kommentar(er)
